-
I agree that every solution will eventually come back to either adding a parameter to the search criteria or a tag to the game description, both of which could be done simply without adding to the workload of the Goozex staff. Obviously, adding to the description page is a project that starts just like eating an elephant, one bite at a time. It could
-
Thanks for the reply. I agree that involving the Goozex staff is unreasonable, however, an alert area after someone has had a problem IE: Starforce, would give the next user an opportunity to check the game out first, and then the onus is on him/her to continue with the trade or not.
-
I buy into the responsibility issue on my part, what I question is: 1-If you know that you have a game that has compatibility issues IE: Star Force Protection there should be a way to convey that to potential new owners 2- How difficult would it be to add some boxes to the advanced search page to address this issue? 3- The Goozex arena should be a friendly
-
Thanks for the reply, My problem is that my machine is so tricked out that it is overqualified for starforce protection games. You would however, think that Microsoft should have made a little more backward compatibility. the-locksmith
-
Call me curious, but am I the only one who is irritated that we cannot identify Vista problems before getting a trade? Why can't a box be added to the search parameters to show games with Star force protection to avoid getting a game that will not load on a Vista machine. I realize that Vista is relatively new, but it has been around for a while
-
I noticed in my feedback that a trade was closed by system, what exactly does that mean? the-locksmith
-
I just recently switched over to Vista, and was wondering if there is any way to indicate that a game will actually run on Vista. What brought this up is that I just had a game returned that I ran on XP but the person getting it said that he had a problem and didn't want to keep it for this reason. I can envision that this sort of problem will pop
-
Thanks for the reply, however, I received the first and only request on Saturday 5/31 at 5:30pm and the timeout on Sunday 6/1 at 8:00 pm. Had there been 2 requests, I would have been able to respond. the-locksmith
-
I have been the victim of quick timeouts. Sending a request at 5:30 pm on a Sat night and then timing out before I get to read my mail on Monday morning seems unreasonable. My suggestion would be a 3 day window which would allow for weekends, holidays, etc. What is the general feeling on this matter? the-locksmith
